Wednesday, April 3, 2013

How America Subverted te Meaning of a College Education

America's history with education is odd. Mind you - for my perspective to fully make sense - I'll be linking articles. They're sort-of long, but I ask those interested in my response to read them.

While I'm going to be talking mostly about college, I'd implore you to read this article from the Atlantic, What Americans Keep Ignoring About Finald's School Success, but more over...

Education's sole purpose is not "to get a job". Or at least, this has not historically been the case. It has been the intent to educate people - and "education" and what's applicable to the corporate world are not always the same thing.

Valuable knowledge and the ability to understand art, philosophy, social sciences - this shapes thought, this thought shapes society, it shapes our ethics, or actions as citizen, these are things that can empower future leaders to be citizens that can see a bigger picture. These are subjects that give our work meaning and put our work in perspective. It's not what to think that's only important, it's not just a set of skills to do a job that are needed. It's knowing how to think that shapes the course of our society.

The problem with turning education merely into something that people consider directly "useful" is that you create a nation of people who do complex tasks, but who do not question why they are doing them, who these tasks benefit, etc.

Education has turned into nothing more than mere vocational training. It is increasingly people paying for their own job training - something companies used to provide to their employees on their dollar. People through this system become people who toil and follow direction, people who accept a top-down culture (increasingly shaped by corporations) without any kind of rebellion.

And you can see it's effects in youth culture - as the hippies turned to punks, punk grew to grunge and hip hop and rave culture and now you just have this cannibalistic hipster culture that cannibalizes itself. But look at the ethics about the establishment - every passing generation is more accepting than the last, every next generation defines its culture as consumer culture more than the last.

Now - even by the so called rebellious underground cultures - you're considered lame to be protesting "the man" or consumer/corporate culture. And I think, in part, this has to do with america getting away from having respect for thinkers. If you get anything from all I blab about and link to here, get this: Information is not the same as knowledge - and our education system is geared more and more towards information.

But look where we're at today. We (IMO) have too many people going to college, too many people being charged too much to go to college and then essentially become indentured servants for years after education (if they can get a job), and the quality of said education is going down as education is more likely to be vocational training for jobs and not actual education.

But a little history is needed to look at the big picture. At the end of the civil rights era it became illegal to not employ racial minorities from jobs and work places. At the time most companies both did not require you to have a college degree to perform a job, because, like today, college degrees say nothing about whether you can or cannot perform said job.

Look at modern jobs: HR assistants, administrative assistants, call centers, entry level IT workers, some rudimentary sales jobs, entry level graphic design jobs - these don't require college degrees as a means to prove you can do it but it's a prerequisite to being hired.

What is needed is job training. Job training has been slowly externalized - whether by intent or unintentional consequence is beyond me, but why?

Employers started requiring college degrees for simple jobs because it was an economic barrier to keep blacks out. This was largely off the books, unspoken and off the record and hard to substantiate. I used to have several links backing this up and have not been able to find them for some time. If anyone else can find anything backing this up i'd be glad to see it - but until then I suppose you can take my [citation needed] with a grain of salt.

This requirement for college degrees changed the national discussion about education and a number of government programs were eventually started to assist people to obtain college education.

As more people started getting college education, what education gave people started to change, away from something that leaned more towards hard academics and more towards "job training". As this occurred you started to see companies do away with their "on the job training". Because, by happenstance, the process and the expense was now externalized onto the citizen.

In the last 15+ years we've seen a boom in vocational accredited "universities" that are nothing short of diploma factories. These schools are expensive, they have no requirements for attendance really - your high-school GPA, your SAT scores, your ACT scores - none of that matters. But we're all told we need college degrees to get jobs, the government is willing to subsidize part of it, and people are free to sign their name on endless dotted lines.

These schools are the epitome of vocational training, but somehow they're accredited as if they're Clemson or Duke or Radford even. Academic courses are made to be blown through. Fake statistics are given from the schools like "95% of our graduates get jobs in their chosen fields" and they fail to mention to you that if you chose to work flipping burgers, well then you got a job in your chosen field. Devry, Strayer, University of Pheonix, South University, and hundreds more. PBS/Frontline did a good documentary on all this called College, Inc.. There's a small article covering it here.

But that documentary talks about the for-profits chains and online schools and other diploma factories. What about the actual colleges out there? They too have been corporatized and trivialized. You can start to look at this at this blog, How the American University was killed in 5 steps. The short of it covers the defunding of public higher education, the demoralization and impoverishment of professors, the dominance of an managerial and administrative class within the university system, and the insertion of corporate culture and money into the university system. I recommend reading the link.

On top of that, student life has been trivialized by a multi-billion dollar sports industry and the thought that Greek life and college life are one in the same. School, as it becomes a vocational training facility - has also become a means to entertain middle class and rich kids. Chris Hedges again, talks about this in the Perversion of Scholarship.

And when all is said and done this has profound impact on culture. We no longer respect thinkers. We mock English majors, we make fun of philosophers. STEM graduates sit around self assured of our own awesomeness constantly mocking art majors by posing the statement that they're degree means nothing more than a future of asking "Do you want fries with that?"

Do not get me wrong, there is a contradiction in our society - we need more STEM majors to be competitive - but we also need to find a respect of thinkers and these things do not have to be at odds with each other.

In America nothing is more important than making a buck. Never mind the fact that the educational world has been changed into mere vocational training and making us all into indentured wage slaves, because mere job training has been externalized into the regular citizen taking out loans. And why? It all started with rich white businessmen trying to keep blacks out by making it about "qualifications" rather than race.

Even today, the EEOC states that companies of certain sizes must employ a certain percentage of minorities based on the population demographics of the location of the companies. So the companies move further away high minority areas, or they staff minorities in low rung jobs. Anything higher than entry level IT, sales, managerial spots, etc. are still greatly white.

Companies do a little dance, and sometimes even opt to take on the EEOC fines rather than attempt to meet the reasonable quotas set unto them. Meanwhile, a portion of white people are convinced that affirmative action still means they have the short end of the stick now. Tell that to all the black males who got hit much harder - percentage wise - than any other demographic during the recession. But that's another topic.

I suppose my point is this nation doesn't respect thinkers. We only see education as a tool used for job employment. Because we're 'Murica. And nothing is more important than money and buying shit.

In Europe there are fewer college grads, but I find the American dream more alive there than here. A picture was posted the other day of a man who came from a family of janitors. He was the first in his family to go to college. He said he was proof the American dream was still alive.

In most European nations you don't have DeVrys. College isn't some drunken beer fest and endless sporting event to spectate. If you have good grades the state will pay for you to go to school. All you need is good grades in most nations. That's it. And for the most part the corporate world stays out of it.

Even in our "higher academic" realms where education in the sciences are still going strong, schools are selling off the results of studies, patents on inventions that were done by the labor of kids who are paying to attend the school to the highest bidder, so these things can be locked away by some corporation and IP law.

The school system in this nation has been made to serve the interests of business first and foremost and almost exclusively. And the american people can't wait for it to do so even more. They are salivating to kick the shit out of those "faggot" art majors, those "sissy" English majors, those "useless" philosophers, or theoretical scientists even. Because they have the limited vision to see what these people can offer society.

And as we become a nation obsessed with vocation as a means to endless consumption, we find ourselves in a race to the bottom as corporations decide that regardless of how large our loans are (which are nothing more than externalized job training we paid for ourselves) we're too expensive. And now we're meant to compete at the scab wages of nations that haven't figured out that kissing in public isn't a travesty worthy of a stoning.

from

Tuesday, April 2, 2013

Guide to IT Fields

Support
  1. Helpdesk - Provide phone-based support to users, helping people open their email, reset passwords, etc. Often read from a troubleshooting script or search an internal knowledgebase/wiki for solutions to frequent issues. Entry level, little to no experience needed. Mostly found at mid-to-large sized companies. If a problem doesn't have a simple solution or can't be solved locally, they escalate to...
  2. Helpdesk level 2/Desktop Support - Handles more complex problems that aren't as frequently occurring. May have greater permissions in the corporate network (create accounts for new employees, setup email distribution lists, etc.) Desktop support would be located in the same offices as the user and would help with things that require physical access (set up a projector, swap out broken computers). 0 - 2 year experience required. More complex issues, or new frequent issues are escalated to...
  3. Help desk level 3 - Handles complex problems. May be responsible for basic systems admin tasks such as building/updating system images installed on all users computers, or testing application updates. Highly knowedgeable in applications used in in various parts of the company. Writes knowledgebase articles for level 1. 1-3 yrs experience. Has very complex issues escalated to Systems Administrator, or persons responsible for a certain technology (network outage to the network team, email to the messaging administrator, etc...).
Administration
  1. Systems Administrator - Jack of all trades, responsible for many different systems in the business. Familiar with multiple OSs (Windows, linux, unix), server hardware, basic to advanced networking. Jr. SysAdmin 1-2 years experience, SysAdmin 1-3 years experience, Sr. Sysadmin 3-5 years, Systems Engineer 3-7+ years experience. Will gain knowledge in all areas, but specialize in none.
  2. Network Administrator. Advanced knowledge of networking. Works with Routers, Switches, VOIP phones, firewalls, load balancers, etc. See Systems Administrator for levels.
  3. Storage Administrator. Advanced knowledge of storage hardware (SANS, NAS) and networking infrastructure. Responsible for ensuring data is available, performing, backed up, etc. Generally, no junior positions, sysadmins/network admins may move into this from other areas.
  4. Virtualization Administrator. Combines Sys Admin, Networking, and Storage skills + knowledge of virtualization platforms. Generally, no junior positions, sysadmins/network/storage admins may move into this from other areas.
  5. Database Administrator: Advanced knowledge of 1 or more database systems. Responsible for maintaining database systems, troubleshooting, and working with developers to performance tune applications/databases, database design. general sysadmin knowledge along with basic networking and basic-to-mid storage required. Generally no junior positions, sys admins/developers may move in to the specialization.
Datacenter
  1. Datacenter monkey (NOC) - Monitors datacenter. Tells others when there are red lights. Reboots systems when told, runs cable, plugs things in, rack and stack etc. 0-2 yrs experience. generally moves into network admin or sysadmin positions
  2. Advanced datacenter designer person. Sr. Sysadmin skills + Advanced Networking + heating/cooling/electrical/diesel generators/batteries bigger than your fridge/thermodynamics knowledge.
Development
  1. Developer/software engineer. Writes code, 0-x years experience. Knows languages like Java, C#, Python, Ruby, etc. Familiar with SQL/databases, JavaScript.
  2. Web developer. Writes HTML, CSS, JavaScript. Makes websites look nice. 0-x years experience
  3. Database developer. Knows SQL well, should know database design but probably doesn't. Should know basic database administrator skills but probably doesn't. 0-x years experience.
Business Analyst/project Management
  1. Business Analyst 0-x years experience. Works with business to identify application needs. Writes a SHITTON of documentation. Works with developers to translate business/functional requirements to an application.
  2. Project manager. Works with business and technical teams to ensure proper staffing, resources, timelines etc. No one really likes them, they get shit on by everyone.
Ops (operations)
  1. Sysadmins for web/software companies.
DevOPs
  1. Not a job, a culture! Uses code to manage infrastrucutre and make it robust. Uses infrastructure to make code robust. 5-7 years experience. Reads Visible Ops, Lean Startups, Continuous Deployment, and factory/manufacturing theory books for fun (along with the latest networking wunderbook while coding a program to post in the corporate IRC chat channel whenever new code is deployed into production. Because its all automated, and every employee deploys new code into production, from IT to the receptionist (see: Etsy. First day at Etsy? you click the deploy updates to site button)
from

Monday, April 1, 2013

Online Privacy and Deleting Your Digital Footprint

First, you're going to want to 'stop the bleeding' as it were. You need to lock down any potential information leaks like insecure social networking profiles before attempting to actually delete anything, otherwise you'll just hemorrhage more information to replace that which you've removed. I'd recommend using PrivacyFix to accomplish that initial goal: http://privacyfix.com/start

At this point you'll also want to secure whichever browser you're using. Companies use trackers to generate a profile on you that can compromise your security. A list of add-ons that will aid you to that end can be found here: http://fixtracking.com/

Having patched any leaks, you'll want to set about removing your information from any aggregator websites that have posted it. A list of these sites and the proper removal technique can be found here: http://unlistmy.info/

It would also be prudent to examine your past behavior to see if any remnants linger from years before such as defunct MySpace profiles created before you came to understand the important of information security. Sites like Pipl: https://pipl.com/ are extraordinarily useful in this capacity, as they aggregate results from a variety of sites that are not necessarily indexed by Google with any depth.

Finally, if you're especially concerned about something showing up that has yet to arise, you can use Blekko: http://blekko.com/ to generate an RSS feed consisting of any search terms you choose, alerting you upon discovery of anything new. It's not especially broad, but given that Google Alerts have ceased to function properly these last few months, it's the best you're really able to do. There are powerful paid alternatives like Mention if you ultimately choose to go down that route.

There are other techniques that can certainly be of use, but the rest of these approaches tend to be narrow in scope.

from

Depression and Thoughts

I will do my best to communicate it. Imagine your mind is like a tree, and your thoughts are like branches. The more time you dedicate towards a certain thought, the stronger that branch will become.

I had terrible depression for seven years. It didn't start bad, but it grew steadily worse and worse. It worsened because each of my thoughts would merge with the "depression branch" and make it stronger and after six years my "tree" was warped and bent under the weight of the depression. All of my perceptions were tied to it, and I had very few branches independent of it.

This was until I learned about Cognitive Therapy. This is the process of monitoring your inner-dialogue and restructuring it. For example: If I did poorly on a test the event would be associated with school, which would be associated with my shame that it was taking me so long to graduate, which then attached itself to the depression branch. Cognitive Therapy taught me to prevent the event from attaching to that branch by stopping the thought-chain of "test failure - school - shame - depression" and instead trying something else like "test failure - shit happens" or "test failure - lesson to learn - don't stay up late."

All of this occurred while I began taking Adderall. After a year of atrophy, the depression branch withered and died because I wasn't supplying it food by linking my thoughts to it. Not only did it die, but entire negative thought-trains are lost to me because they existed solely within that branch.

So nowadays I lay down and wander around my thoughts. If I find a thought that has caused me considerable troubled in the past I will follow it to see where it leads. If it goes nowhere positive then I return to the initial starting point and "snap it." So every time I think of that inciting thought I imagine a twig breaking off, and I remind myself not to journey down that thought. After some time, I forget the thought is even there, and it dies.

Your brain is a plant. Plants need to be trimmed every so often because a branch will become infected, or leaves will rot, or it will grow a limb that hurts its growth. You cut this branch by disassociating from the thought and forbidding yourself from following it.

from

Friday, March 29, 2013

Putting a Pet Down

When I have a dog that needs to be put to sleep, I talk to the vet the day before. I don't even take my dog with me, I explain to them (if they are a new vet to me... my usual vets know the routine) that I want the dog to have a tranquilizer, for me to have a few minutes with them like that, and when they put them to sleep, for them to leave me alone with the body for at least ten minutes. The reason for that is because they claim that the brain is alive for 4-6 minutes after the heart stops, and I don't want my pet thinking at any time that I had abandoned them at the end of their life. Valium will just relax them and make them feel good, propofol will put them into what is called a twilight sleep... will tell you more about that in a bit. I also sign the consent form on the day before.

But when you go in, hold them, talk to them and just love on them. Let kitty know that she isn't entering this alone, or surrounded with strangers. That you, the great love of her life is there with her.

I am going to ask you to not think about death while going into this. This is going to sound nuts, but on more than one occasion, I have caught my dogs reading my mind (can tell you specifics about that later as well if you want), but just in case she can read your thoughts, think about a benign procedure. Maybe a teeth cleaning, or nail trim.

Anyhow, go, hold her and talk to her.

I don't know of a vet anywhere that will demand that you put kitty to sleep before you are ready. They will allow your pet to die in great pain and naturally, if that is what you so desire. And just because they make a suggestion doesn't mean you have to follow their suggestion. They are medical professionals, not prison wardens. You very much will have free will in the process. But if a suggestion is made (which is unlikely), you are free to say "I am not ready to do that right now". And more often than not, they won't even say that, they will ask you "what do you want to do". About the only way I've been able to elicit suggestions from my vets is by asking "if this were your dog, what would you do", and they would tell me what they would do, if this scenario happened to their pet.

from

Thursday, March 28, 2013

The Reasons for Brown and Orange Clothes in the 70s

Fashion often changes in broad, pendulum-like swings, and this is a good example of the phenomenon. But while the question is deceptively simple, the answer is complex, because it involves explaining several social and historical convergences. Bear with me, if you will, and I hope all will become clear:

In the early 70's, there came about, pretty abruptly, a strong visual backlash against the electric, high-chroma,"psychedelic" colour palette that was such an iconic feature of the late 60's hippie culture; in short, the style got old very fast. The reasons were multiple: America was now deep in a quagmire of war; thousand were being drafted and returning home in coffins, mere weeks after their induction; protesters were being beaten and jailed; every day, the newspapers revealed our leaders to be ever more egregiously stupid crooks, liars and fools. Madness and anarchy seemed to lie around every corner.

Somehow all that celebratory, fun, acid-saturated colour now seemed silly and self-indulgent. It became as inappropriate as wearing a "Smile" t-shirt to a schoolbus rollover. And all the gentle social upheaval and genial questioning of institutional values that those bright colours once cheekily promised? Well, they no longer carried much appeal. In fact, they seemed frightening - just more uncertainty and conflict, in already uncertain and conflicted times.

People were suddenly in the visual mood for something more muted, contemplative and restrained. The faintly mournful "autumn" colour palette - dark orange, oxblood, copper, brown, harvest gold, avocado green - filled that need so well that, as you point out, it literally became symbolic of the decade. Perhaps simply because it reminded folks of a less complex time, when subtle, visually digestible, vegetable-based dyes coloured our surroundings, rather than incomprehensible, knock-your-eyes-out chemical pigments.

Concurrently with the shift in colour preferences, smaller, meticulously repeated patterns once again began to appear on fabrics and wallpapers, as sharp stylistic counterpoint to the free-form, Yellow Submarine-esque, "supergraphic rainbow" visuals that had overwhelmed every available wall surface during the previous decade.

Those autumn colours also thematically supported, and were cross-fertilized by, the decade's nascent "natural" movement. Still inspired by the lofty ideals of their older siblings' recently failed hippie paradigm, and boosted by the first vague stirrings of the modern ecology movement, '70s boomers forsook (at least temporarily) their parents' blatant consumerim, and instead embraced the generationally dormant, homespun handicrafts of their grandparents: macramé, crochet, bargello, weaving, leatherworking, cutting down old beer bottles into drinking glasses. The handicrafts they created and proudly decorated their homes with were mostly made from organic materials, so they just looked better when surrounded with earth-tone colours.

Chromatic colour was out, because it detracted from the workmanship - which was, after all, what differentiated handmade-and-unique from factory-extruded and common.

This attitudinal shift towards muted, "homemade" colour and texture, and away from slick, obviously industrial colours and finishes was, at least in part, probably a subconscious side-effect of the 70's generation's fast-growing resentment of both the politician-buying industrial complex, and its ongoing material support for a war they despised. The war ended in '75, but resentments lingered. It was, if you will, a form of protest, or boycott: a generation's tentative, somewhat pathetic attempt to re-exert control over their own visual destiny, and to wrest whatever tiny part of their environment they still could, away from the overbearing and apparently malignant industrial and commercial forces that were threatening to overwhelm them socially, financially and politically.

At the same time as these color and design changes took hold in home decor, people began gradually shifting their wardrobes back to natural wools and cottons. After a decade and a half of collecting increasingly slinky, shiny, uncomfortable, odiferous and obviously synthetic garments - which were themselves a pendulum-swing away from the ossified white-cotton-shirt, gray-flannel-suit ethos of the two decades following WWII, the fabric-choice pendulum was again swinging back. And in clothing, as in interior design, autumnal, natural colours were generally seen to be more complementary to natural materials than chromatic colours.

That all being said, the prevalence of the autumnal palette wasn't really as all-encompasing as retro media like That 70's Show would have us believe. Designers frequently go kind of over-the-top when they try to recreate a period look, a generation or more later. Frankly, even Mad Men, though certainly very well researched, is visually a little overbearing in its representation of the period; after all, not everything in the Sixties was of the Sixties; some of it hailed from the Fifties and Forties, even the Thirties.

Just as we still occasionally see an 80's wood panelled Buick land-shark station wagon in the Walmart parking lot, or a suitcase-sized VCR parked under a friend's tube TV, I long to see a cheap postwar suit on some poor agency schlub who supervises the steno pool. Instead, everybody wears Brooks Brothers. All the time.

It is also instructive to realize that within any fashion era "look" you'd care to examine, competing visual ideas constantly jousted with one another for dominance. Visual style is a roiling river, not a still pond. Remember that the "natural, homespun" 70's were also the era that gave birth to platform boots for men, polyester lounge suits, "designer" jeans, disco, the New York Dolls, foil wallpaper, smoked glass coffee tables, naugahyde sofas, spherical stereo speakers, shag carpet, gold-veined mirror tiles, chrome overhead lamps, and pink Christmas trees. For further proof, take another look at Goodfellas, with an eye to the set decoration and costumes; it is a veritable omnibus of questionable 70's design.

from

Tuesday, March 26, 2013

What is Dandruff?

Dandruff is a form of seborrheic dermatitis, which is also classically found in the eyebrows and on the sides of the nose. The condition itself is not fully understood, but is thought to be a reaction to varying types of Malassezia, yeast that resides in pretty much everyone's sebaceous glands (which cluster in the affected areas). Although pretty much everyone has the yeast, only certain people seem to react to it regularly. On the scalp this is known as dandruff.

Importantly, there are also forms of psoriasis which can be isolated to the scalp and can cause flaking, which can be indistinguishable on clinical exam but respond to treatment differently as it likely is not secondary to the yeast implicated in seborrheic dermatitis. Tar and salicyclic acid compounds (Tsal and Tgel) have shown mild relief in the improvement of psorasis, and can help people with mild scalp psoriasis. These will have limited effect in seborrheic dermatitis.

Now as for seborrheic dermatitis, there are two treatment options. One is to reduce the burden of the yeast and the second is to try to damp down the body's abnormal immune response against it (which is causing the inflammation and scaling).

Ketoconazole (Nizoral) cream and shampoo tend to work fantastically for this with limited side effects. Prescription strength is 2%, over the counter is 1%. People usually start 2-3 times weekly, leaving in form fives minutes, for a few weeks dropping to once weekly when under control. This alone often solves the problem. Alternating with selenium sulfide shampoos (ie Head and shoulders) can also help.

Alternatively, mild topical steroids can be prescribed (we usually give hydrocortisone 2.5% cream, although the 1% is over the counter) to reduce inflammation, but there can be long term side effects to its use such as skin thinning, hypopigmentation and telangiectasia so I usually stick with ketoconazole given the paucity of side effects.

Once you understand the condition, you might ask why cool water showers helps control it versus hot water. Short answer, it likely doesn't. Hot water can dehydrate our skin more, make you itchier and in particularly cause flaring with eczema, but does not plan a major role in the pathogenesis of seborrheic dermatitis.