Tuesday, August 27, 2013

Future Studies and the Singularity

I. Ray Kurzweil is a large part of the futurist conversation. But to teach entirely from his work is unbalanced. He is one of many primary sources. /u/heredami mentioned the 3 schools of thought; accelerating change, the event horizon, and an intelligence explosion.

II. Study past trends to predict the future(s). I would cover the history of Silicon Valley, the beginning of Intel, Fairchild semiconductor, and even Shockley semiconductor. The story of the traitorous eight, Shockley's fall from power, and Noyce and Moore's creation of Intel is incredible. This is the Eniac, a room sized computer that took multiple people to operate. 20 years later, Moore and Noyce's Integrated Electronics produced the 4004 microchip that outperformed the Eniac in size, power, speed and many other returns. We witness a progression in only 50 years; vaccuum tube> transistor> microchip.

III. Study the methodology of forecasting. Instead of one set future, the scientific consensus is the theory of a multiverse. This infographic by NASA scientist Dan Berry does it best; there is no one set future, but a great plurality of future(s). In fact, there is no 'present' at all. The present moment is a figure of speech that humans use to communicate ideas across a small duration of time. There is a conversation about it, here. While one can never predict the future, prediction is relative, a matter of degree. The same as reknowned physicist Michio Kaku claims that the concept of impossibility is relative, so too are the future(s). Arthur C. Clarke said it best in his three laws. The Paradox of Futurology and technological forecasting is inescapable. But Future(s) Studies has structure and methodology. Different aspects of the future are predictable with varying degrees of reliability and precision. For there to be a degree of predictability, it is not necessary that it be possible to identify one specific scenario as what will definitely happen. If there is at least some scenario that can be ruled out, that is indeed a degree of predictability (Bostrom). Bertrand de Jouvenal was an early writer and his dichotomy of futura and facta still provide insight to this profoundly evolutionary practice humans do; chronesthesia. Here is a list of a number of theories for mental 'time traveling' from neuroscience.

IV. With these corner stones and primary sources of Future(s) Studies covered, I'd move on to the interesting and imagination-capturing stuff. /u/heredami provided some of the essential publications by the Machine Intelligence Research Institute. To complement, read through the AMA from the current CEO, Luke Muehlhauser here. Luke answers every insightful question with sources and links. I have collected and saved some of the very bestof and most in-depth comments, explanations, and thoughts that our /r/futurology have created throughout the life of our community. Each post I have collected deserves more analysis and scrutiny. They have all addressed these topics better than I ever could. Our collection below is the aggregate of some of the most profound and paradigm-shattering worldviews that define and redefine the art and science of Future(s) Studies.
source

Wednesday, August 21, 2013

Happiness

A significant part of a person's unhappiness is caused by them constantly thinking only of themselves. The repetitive focus on self and their own unhappiness keeps that unhappiness vibrant. It's like a constant negative drumbeat inside them. But if they didn't think of themselves at all, how could they be unhappy?

Unhappiness is separate from problems, because everyone has problems and pains, but not everyone is unhappy.

One solution to unhappiness is to volunteer somewhere where people are suffering and need help -- like a hospital. Working for others in any kind of real way will interrupt the flow of repetitive negative self-talk and create room for love and compassion for others again, and happiness will then have room to flower.

Wake Up Sheeple!

Here is the simple formula:

Use lowered profits as an excuse to lay off a few people. Remind daily the remaining workers that they are lucky to still have a job. Remind them that 'things are rough out there.'

Continue to use lowered profits (a simple threat of just being in business...almost every business deals with lowered profits at some point) to take away health care benefits and cut back on retirement programs: "Things are tough. If we want to stay in business, we're going to have to cut back." ...the 'we' that is cutting back is, of course, you...the worker.

Remind the workers that with less employees, people are going to have to work twice as hard if they want to see the profits get back up where there pay freeze is lifted. Also, you cannot take vacation right now because there aren't enough employees to make up for the two jobs that you're working.

If you're brave, go for pay cuts across the board. Remind the workers than it's better than 'nothing at all. You're still very lucky to have a job in 'this economic environment.' Now is a good time to remind workers how many people are losing their homes and investments right now. They sure are lucky.

After you've cut back every conceivable program that helps the worker or helps to increase his/her wages/benefits, watch the corporate profits rise. And not just rise, but rise to record levels.

Maintain current crew that was cut back dramatically, keep the pay freeze, keep the cut wages make sure people are doing twice the work for less pay and less benefits.

Bottom line: record profits.

How do people not realize this is exactly what happened in most American businesses? They're still working and paying like the recession is still in full ring, yet they're pulling in more profits than ever before.

WHY? Because the workers took the hit. Like they always do. They got shat on and continued to show up at work every morning, talking about how goddamn lucky they were to not be on the layoff list. SO LUCKY! Lucky you. You get to do the jobs of your laid of co-workers, work much more than usual and get compensated much, much less. BUT THE PROFITS ARE UP. Your amazing job is SECURE. For now.

And that's how it's done. Yes, the part-time issue is a big one but it gets thrown into this cycle and approach by business. They know exactly what they're doing and they're laughing all the way to the bank while most working class can still barely keep their heads above water.

And I have a secret for you. PSST...listen up. Wages are like POWER. Those in charge very often take it *but they never, ever give it back.

That's one of the oldest tricks in the book.

Take the Patriot Act for example. During that time when (according to Bush) everyone wanted to kill us because they hated our 'freedoms,' they felt it was appropriate to pass a shit load new laws that restricted your freedom (I suppose) in order to give the terrorists what they wanted: A country with less freedom (again, according to Bush and Co.)

After Bin Laden was killed and things simmered down, the NHS and homeland security was fattened up, they never gave back the rights you used to have. And they never will. Because if you look at the history of government, they take rights away. They pass more laws..think of it as a linear path that moves forward with time. As time goes on, so do restrictions on liberty and freedom.

And that's what businesses do (at least larger corporations) as you give up things like health benefits and retirement benefits and accept lower wages and less security, those are things that are gone for good. Because I can only think of a handful of companies that have ever willingly given up anything to employees.

What is the answer? In a word: Unions.

Period. Organization and solidarity will change things if Americans have the brains and balls to embrace standing up together and saying 'no' for a change instead of constantly saying 'yes' and acting like they have battered woman syndrome. Or maybe it's Stockholm Syndrome where the captive starts to have feelings for the captor.

Either way, things have to change and they have to change soon.

Even if everything changed tomorrow and the minimum wage went up and that created a ripple effect that caused everyone's salaries and wages to go up, they started to invest in more health care benefits, offered you some more vacation time or sick days...these are entities that still went 30 years fattening their wallets and profits on your backs.

A lot of the larger employers (McDonald's, Walmart, AT&T) they have amassed enough profits in that time of wringing out workers that they'll never be hurt. Ever. The Walton family has more wealth than the entire lower 40% of Americans combined and yet they still won't offer basic human kindness to their employees. They're treated like a necessary evil and they're treated like burdens most of the time.

And yet, the truth is that if you work at Walmart or McDonald's and someone tries to convince you that your job isn't important, rest assured that you would NOT be in that store if your presence wasn't completely necessary. You are an important part of the company regardless of how belittled your job is or you have been on the job. They would cut your position in a second without any thought if they thought they could keep running without you. That's what they do: eliminate every single unnecessary position (without regard to customers, employers, etc) that they can possibly still operate with.

Time to stand up. Time for some strength, some wisdom, some courage and time for people to get informed. Time for solidarity and unions...they are the only way. If you're opposed to those things, I'm guessing it's because you've never studied unions are unaware that they created the middle class (which was why the United States was such an envy of other nations for 30 years).

If you're opposed to the idea of unionization, then get comfortable. Your post in life will never change, your life will always be a struggle to keep your head above water and you will most definitely never be able to retire. Not when you're 65, not when you're 75, not when you're 90. You will never save enough wealth to be able to not work.

And that's bullshit. You sell your most precious resource (your time and your health) for pennies on the dollar and you'll never be able to enjoy the fruits of all that constant work. Meanwhile, the higher ups at the companies will amass enough money and assets to last them for 20 lifetimes and then some.

America isn't a fair nation anymore and the corporations are running the government and your interests and your family's interests are the last thing they have in mind.

PROFITS OVER PEOPLE in the new America. You are, officially, worth more dead than you are alive, sadly. And what kind of fucking country gets behind that idea? Not to mention this idea that health care should be a luxury that only the rich should be able to obtain.

If you work full time in any capacity, by God, you fucking deserve to be able to go to the hospital without the threat of bankruptcy if you get sick. You should be able to end up in a car accident without losing your goddamn house in the process.

Wake up. This is your lives and your children's lives and well being we're talking about. Can you not see how much you've been fleeced and how much has been taken of you, constantly asked of you while the ultra wealthy and corporations always make sure that you and your family take the hit when things go bad? And when things go well, you never get to partake in any of the success unless you're a stockholder and that's a position that very few American workers are a part of.

source

Thursday, August 15, 2013

Cheap eating: Cooking Inexpensive Meals

Equipment

Get a metal frying pan - Stainless steel is flexible and easy to use. Nonstick coatings are worthless. A lid is useful, but not required. $5-10 thrift store or $30 new.

Get a large pot you can boil water in, with a lid. Watch out for aluminum pans - They can interact with acidic foods, and you don't want that. $10-15 thrift store or $30 new.

Get a chef's knife and a cutting board. Get a whetstone - The sharper your knife is, the less force you'll be putting behind it when you cut yourself. And you will, eventually, cut yourself. Buy the knife and whetstone new - $30-50. Buy the board at a thrift store - $5.

Get a wooden spoon. Spend a couple extra dollars and buy one with a thick handle - They're surprisingly easy to snap. $3 new.

Don't skimp here - If you buy decent quality gear you won't ever have to buy it again. That said, don't go crazy - that $200 frying pan isn't going to cook your food for you. Buy items that look like you could throw them at a dump truck without hurting them. But don't actually do that.

Greens
Get yourself a big bundle of greens. Kale, chard, mustard, collard, cabbage, stinging nettles (Yup! They stop stinging when you cook 'em), spinach, bok choy, beet greens, radish greens, endive, turnip greens, etc. Don't use lettuces.

Loosely chop your greens, put a little oil in your pan, and turn it to medium heat. Put an inch or so of greens in your pan - A little more if you have a lid.

Feel free to experiment with various oils - Butter, olive oil, lard, vegetable oil, etc. Don't be too afraid of saturated fats here - It doesn't take much to coat a pan of greens.

Cook the greens, stirring casually, until they start to soften, then add a little salt. Taste 'em and turn the heat off when they're soft enough to be tasty.

Now add a little splash of acid - Lemon juice, lime juice, any type of vinegar. A small amount of honey or sugar is a good addition too.

Cheap meat

Well, you got yourself a $3/pound beef roast, or a $2/pound pork roast. Now what?

Get your big pot. Put it on the stove, and put your hunk of meat in it. If you're feeling fancy, put a little oil in the pan and saute each side. Otherwise, skip to the next step.

Wander around the kitchen until you find some sort of liquid. Wine's a great choice. A little vinegar, cut with a lot of water, can do the trick. Any sort of meat or vegetable stock works well. Some people use Dr. Pepper. Don't use cream or milk, they'll curdle, and don't use water, it'll remove all flavor from your meat. Add your liquid to the pot until it covers the bottom by an inch or two.

Put the lid on your pot, turn the heat up to high, and wait for your liquid to almost come to a boil. Once it does, adjust heat to low and find something entertaining to do in a nearby room. You'll want to be able to monitor your stove and pot so it doesn't burn the meat or your house, but it won't need your full attention. Add more liquid as required; don't let it boil dry.

Wait several hours.

Come back to the meat and poke at it with a wooden spoon. Hard. Does it come apart a little? If so, you're done. If not, keep cooking.

Once it's done, pull it out of the pan and chop at it with your knife - Try to carve perpendicular to the little strings in the meat.

Don't throw the liquid away! It pulled out a lot of the flavor from your meat. Turn the heat up and allow it to boil down until it's a thin sauce. Salt it to taste and pour it over your meat slices. Serve.

You'd probably better make a side dish too, or you're going to eat 12 pounds of meat and lie moaning on the floor, "Ooooh.... Why he does this to me? WHY?!"

Vegetables

Pick two or three of the following vegetables: broccoli, zucchini, cauliflower, carrots, brussels sprout, turnips, pumpkins, potatoes, peppers, eggplant, summer squash, onions, garlic (Go light on garlic!), celery, kohlrabi, leek, beets, parsnips.

Chop into smallish bits. Don't stress about keeping them the same shape, but try to keep them roughly the same size. Throw your veggie mix in your frying pan with a little oil. Medium heat, cook until brown, stirring consistently. Add a little salt and pepper, and one random herb - Ideally fresh, but anything that's been in your spice cupboard for less than a year or two will do

If you have a hollow veggie, stuff it with lean hamburger, salt, a few breadcrumbs, and one random herb. A little cheese in the mix works well too, depending on mood. Bake at 300F until the vegetable bit is soft and the meat bit is brown all the way through. You can do this with zuchinni, bell peppers, spicy peppers, etc.

Stock

Jeeze, it feels like there's more bones in a chicken then there is chicken, doesn't it? Don't let the man keep you down - Use that carcass! It was expensive, dammit!

Your leftover bones and clean vegetable scraps should go in a bag in the freezer. Once you've got enough, dump them into your big pot and cover everything with water. Bring it up to a boil, then reduce heat until it stops boiling and put a lid on it. Sweet veggies (Carrots, turnips, etc) and chicken will finish quickly, in only an hour or so. Pork or beef bones will take a couple hours to unlock all the flavor. Go do something in a nearby room while it cooks.

Once it's done, pour the liquid off into whatever you have that'll hold it. This is stock, and it will make you many amazing soups. It'll keep in the freezer for several months, or in the fridge for a couple days.
If you end up with a layer of fat on top of the stock, stick it in the fridge - The fat will rise to the top, and the cold with solidify the fat, allowing you to scrape it off with ease. If you're daring, use it to cook greens.
If your stock turns solid in the fridge, that's absolutely OK - Bones contains gelatin, which will get into your stock. Just warm it up a little to re-liquify it.

Lentils

Oh boy, now you did it. You just had to have that new Playstation 360, so you've got $50 to eat for four weeks. You're screwed.

But not quite. Go to the bulk section and get yourself some lentils. Don't bother with the fancy french lentils or the red lentils; They all taste the same. If they're cheap, split green or yellow peas cook almost identically, and provide a little variety.

Put on some boiling water and throw a handful of lentils in. If you use too many, it'll be thick. If you use too few, it'll be thin. Either way is delicious. Reduce the heat to low, put a lid on 'em, and let 'em sit on the back burner until they're soft. The longer they cook, the more they'll blend into your liquid.

Once they're done, add a little salt. Lentils take to flavorings really well, particularly spicy flavorings. Try a little cayenne pepper and a spoonfull of sour cream. Alternatively, a small amount of honey or molasses is delicious. You could also use meat or veggie stock in place of water for some extra flavor.

Lentils are extremely cheap and high in protein. With a little added fat they're a nutritious, filling meal for pennies.

Beans are very much like lentils, although they take much longer to cook. They're sort of lentils on hard mode.

Pasta

Add salt to boiling water - This will improve the flavor of the resulting pasta. If you're cooking filled pasta or small, curvy pasta, a couple drops of oil added to the water can help keep it from sticking while you drain it. For long, thin pasta, prompt application of sauce should be enough to keep it from sticking. Throw your pasta in the water.

Be careful not to overcook your pasta - Take out a little and try some while it's cooking. You want your pasta to still have a little structure to it, not be slimy and limp. Once it's done, drain your pasta. If you've got a colander or sieve, use that - Otherwise use the lid to strain out the liquid, being careful not to burn yourself.
Apply store-bought pasta sauce. Yeah, I said it - You CAN make your own, but you're not going to do it that much cheaper than pre-made sauce, and it's a tricky sauce to season.

A little hamburger, cooked in your frying pan, is a good way to add protein.

Pasta takes hardly any time or thought - Perfect for nights when you don't want to cook!

Shopping

See the middle of the store? Ignore it.

What you want is on the outside of the store. Start in the produce section, and linger. Vegetables are good for you, cheap, filling, and delicious. Grab a good amount, and some fruit too - Wards off scurvy. You don't want scurvy.

Once that's done, wander on over to the bulk section. Pick up your pastas, lentils, a few spices, and maybe a few nuts or dried fruit for a snack. You don't need candy, put it back.

Next is meat. Pork and chicken are cheapest, beef is the most expensive. Don't buy steaks, you aren't Rockefeller. Cheap cuts of meat take longer to cook, but are just as flavorful and nutritious as the expensive cuts. Sausages can provide some nice variety.

The dairy section is just around the corner. A little cheese can be a nice addition to a lot of meals. Eggs are versatile and protein-rich, but tricky to cook if you want anything but scrambled eggs.

Ignore the chip isle, the candy isle, and the soda isle. If you need a few baking goods (particularly oils), wander down that isle. Canned fruits and veggies are usually more expensive than fresh. Ignore the pre-made frozen foods like the plague - You can make better food, cheaper.

In my area, farmers markets are cheaper than the big stores for produce, but inside cities this tends to reverse. YMMV.

Finally, consider whole meats. Beef at the market usually starts at $3/lb. Beef, purchased by the half or quarter from a butcher or farmer usually stops at $3/lb. You can save money on whole lambs and pigs, too. You'll need a chest freezer to store it, though, and you'll need to pay for it all up front.

source

Building a Website: Starter Guide

Validate Your Skill Level

Are you currently a web programmer? If no, please do not attempt to become one to code your own dynamic website as security is a huge issue and it will take you years to catch up. It is not a reasonable effort to put forth if you want to keep your sanity, not burn your spare time, etc. Not saying you can't learn it, just saying it takes a lot of work and time that most entrepreneurs don't have to use and in some cases waste.
You can learn how to do html and css within a few months but using a CMS system is much cleaner and easier and if you need something dynamic, you will probably need a developer.
You generally need to know at least php and mysql for dynamic websites unless you want to get into the confusing worlds of joomla and drupal. I hear decent things about Ruby on Rails though on par with php and mysql learning curve I think.

Want to Learn Web Programming Anyway?

Try CodeCademy for interactive programming learning.

No Coding Skills Start Here

Get / Use the following:
Need Something More Dynamic?

You have a few options. This list goes from least expensive to most expensive. Just know that most things you want to do already have a plugin or theme designed for them for WordPress. There are however a lot of exceptions to that guideline and that is why you look at the following options.
  • Least Expensive end
  • Hire someone to develop a WordPress plugin to do that dynamic stuff (cheaper than second option)
  • Hire someone to build you a custom WordPress theme that has the functionality you need.
  • Hire someone to develop the site from the ground up.
  • Most expensive end
The reason why WordPress is mentioned a lot is because it is a CMS aka Content Management System which allows you to manage a ton of the pages and posts and various other aspects of the website. If a developer really needs to, they can modify the core parts of WordPress. Rarely will you need someone to build you a brand new website and honestly you really do want a CMS or you are going to have a hard time.
Some developers can be found here: Elance (freelancers), Matchist (freelancers), and Glowtouch (dev company vetted by Bluehost)

Things to remember with website development
  • Try to use a responsive website themes and plugins so that it can fit any screen size including tablets and phones.
  • Get familiar with what they call "sticky footer" so that your footers don't end up halfway up the screen on low content pages. Example and info.
  • Get familiar with the concept of having a fixed header as it will promote a lot of use of your website. Example and info.
  • Design is important. You have ~2.6 seconds to capture their attention before they bounce. Read this book to learn about it: "Don't Make Me Think"
  • Best colors to use for design and other design tricks (the best you are going to find): Article and Video
source

Wednesday, August 14, 2013

Sleep Deprivation: Long and Short Term

The answer to the question depends on the timescale. The human response to sleep restriction is different, depending whether it is acute or chronic.

In the early days of sleep research, most experiments involving sleep restriction were total sleep deprivations, meaning participants in the study were allowed no sleep at all for some period of time, usually 1-3 nights (although a few crazy studies did go over 200 hours).

In these types of experiments, it was discovered that recovery tends to occur quite rapidly. To explain this, I need to refer to a model of human sleep regulation called the two-process model. In the two process model, it is assumed that human sleep is primarily regulated by two physiological processes: a circadian process and a sleep homeostatic process. The circadian process is the approximately 24-hour biological rhythm in sleepiness/alertness. The sleep homeostatic process is the process that promotes sleep more the longer that you have been awake.

Sleep homeostatic pressure builds up during time spent awake and dissipates during time spent asleep. Although we don't yet know precisely what causes the sleep homeostatic process (it may be the build up of sleep-promoting substances in the brain, including adenosine), it turns out that there is a good physiological marker for the sleep homeostatic process.

Normally, during a night of sleep, people cycle semi-regularly between states of NREM sleep and REM sleep. If you record somebody's brain electrical activity using EEG, you find that during NREM sleep, there is a high level of delta waves. These show up as big waves cycling about once per second in the EEG recordings. Across the night, the amount of delta waves in NREM sleep decreases approximately exponentially. Moreover, if you deprive someone of sleep and then let them get recovery sleep, their delta waves still decline exponentially across the night, but the initial level of delta waves at the beginning of the night is significantly higher.

It turns out that the two-process model can do a very good job of explaining the changes in delta waves across the night and in response to total sleep deprivation if you assume that the homeostatic sleep pressure builds up exponentially with a time constant of ~20 hours during wakefulness, and decays exponentially with a time constant of ~3 hours during sleep.

This has two important implications. First, the homeostatic sleep pressure would be expected to saturate to a maximum level quite rapidly -- within only a few days, given the time constant of ~20 hours. Second, even after a huge sleep deprivation, the homeostatic sleep pressure would be expected to return to approximately normal levels within a night or two of sleep, because the time constant for dissipation is only ~3 hours. Indeed, both of these predictions are true for total sleep deprivation. Even when people are deprived of sleep for 100+ hours, they tend to sleep for no more than about 14 hours on the first night of recovery. In other words, they do not pay back every hour of sleep missed.

For a while, it seemed like we therefore had sleep regulation figured out, at least in essence. However, the two-process model fails miserably when it is applied to the more common type of sleep restriction in day-to-day life: chronic sleep restriction for many consecutive days, e.g., getting only 6 hours of sleep per night for 14 consecutive days. Under these conditions, the two-process model would again predict that sleep homeostatic pressure would level off within a few days and recovery would be achieved at the end within one or two nights, i.e., a weekend. That is absolutely not what we see.

When individuals are chronically restricted of sleep for periods of 2-3 weeks, we instead find that cognitive impairment accumulates day by day, almost linearly. There is no sign of saturation or leveling off. Things just continue to get worse and worse. Paradoxically, delta waves do level off, just as the two-process model would predict, and so do subjective ratings of sleepiness, meaning people become less and less aware of their level of objective impairment as they are increasingly sleep restricted. After two weeks of getting 6 hours of sleep per night, individuals have the same reaction time as somebody who has been awake for 24 hours, which is approximately equivalent to an individual with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.10%. After two weeks of getting 4 hours of sleep per night, individuals have the same reaction time as somebody who has been awake for 48-72 hours.

The process of recovery also seems to be much slower after chronic sleep restriction, although it has not yet been well quantified. For chronic sleep restriction, there seems to be a much closer to one-to-one correspondence between hours of sleep lost and hours that must be paid back to return to baseline performance. Certainly, it is not possible to reverse the effects of chronic sleep restriction in a single weekend.

We don't yet know what is the physiological process underlying this much slower timescale response to chronic sleep restriction, but there are some hypotheses currently being tested, including up-regulation of adenosine receptors.

So, what about the effects of chronic sleep restriction on even longer timescales? What if you don't get enough sleep continually for a year, or a decade? How long would it then take you to recover? We don't know the answer to that. Laboratory studies of chronic sleep restriction cannot logistically or ethically go much longer than a month. We are therefore forced to rely on epidemiological data. We know that people who habitually get short sleep (less than about 6 hours) have higher rates of all-cause mortality, heart disease, obesity, and diabetes. But we don't know how easily those long-terms outcomes can be reversed by improving sleep patterns. For that, we will need longitudinal data, where people are tracked for years to see what happens if they improve their sleep habits. Those data would be very difficult to obtain, since it is difficult to convince people to make major lifestyle changes, and difficult to control for other lifestyle changes that may go along with them. Chronic sleep restriction also leads to increased hunger and poor diet choice, for instance, which may be one important confounding factor in such a study.

source

Thursday, August 8, 2013

The Sociopathy of Capitalism

Allow me to introduct the concept of ponerology.

This is the idea that a power structure, over time, becomes twisted by the work of relatively few sociopaths until the entire structure and everyone in it behaves and thinks like a sociopath as well.

The idea that profit is the only thing that matters, that employees must be paid as little as possible, is a purely pathological judgement.

Pathological in this context means a decision that is overtly made on 'rational' grounds only. Much like the Randian philosophy of objectivism. Having a perfection definition of 'pathological' isn't necessary to recognize what's wrong.

A pathological person will think any action is logical if they get an immediate benefit. The consequences for others are irrelevant and so are the long-term costs. They are someone else's problem.

The current culture of finance and business is exactly this. The system itself has become pathological as a result of years of sociopaths wielding great power. Now, even a decent, humane person, once they get sucked into the corporate world, will find themselves making utterly pathological decisions and being congratulated for it by other decent, humane people.

These people are not sociopaths, but our culture has reached the point where it's internalised the idea that you have to behave like a sociopath to achieve anything.

Recovering the system from this point is a long and difficult process, and right now there's nobody even willing to say there's a problem.

Which is pathological in itself.

source

Tuesday, August 6, 2013

Questions to Ask at a Job Interview

Here are some good questions to ask when you are being interviewed for a job. They lean toward interviewing for a technical poistionin IT, but should give you some good ideas for questions to ask regardless of the position you are interviewing for.

Finishing Questions

Is there anything about my application that concerns you?

Is there any reason at all that you would hesitate to offer me the job? If so, I'd appreciate the opportunity to address your concerns head-on before we finish.

General Questions

What do you like most about your job and what do you feel sets the company apart from others in the industry?

How long do people tend to stay at the company?

How big are project/product teams?

Do people tend to work with the same people, or switch around? How long do they stay on a single project/product?

How long have the most senior and most junior members of my team been here?

Do employees support each other across product/project teams?

Do engineers tend to discuss technical things unrelated to specific product/project work? (e.g. brown bags, forums, mailing lists).

Do they tend to promote from within? How many of the managers have a technical background?

Do people socialize outside of work?

Are there official/unofficial events?

What is the typical daily schedule like for this position?

On the way out, could you show my where my work area would be?

Can I meet any members of the team?

Friday, July 26, 2013

First World Problems and Being Human

Most of us feel resentment when we see a rich person behaving badly, a spoiled celebrity angry because someone forgot to pick out the green M&Ms, or some other tinyy, ridiculous thing.

When it comes to celebrities or other wealthy people who (we see) living such a priviliged lifestyle, the problem is that the millions and luxury lifestyle have been part of your life for so long that they become invisible, and then the only things that are visible are the little annoyances.

To be like this is not being an asshole, it's only being human.

Consider most people who become petulant and annoyed over such little things; whether the new amazing console coming out will allow them to share games, or that the new super-hero film didn't match their precise expectations, or any other first world problem.

The vast majority of these people don't have to worry about whether there will be a roof over their heads today, if they will be able to feed themselves, will they be able to save their child's life from a preventable disease.

To a significant portion of the human population these are still genuine problems.

From our point of view, the difference between us and someone very wealthy is significant. Someone rich should should know how lucky he is and never ever complain or behave with petulance. We (from our point of view) are nowhere near the level of wealth and success where we should consider ourselves so lucky that we should never complain about anything.

However, from the point of view of many people on earth, the difference between us and someone we see as rich might as well be imperceptible. By that logic, we should never ever complain about anything either.

Which is impossible, because we are all human.

Monday, July 8, 2013

Capitalism and Opportunity

The difference is, nobody is exerting power over anybody else in a consensual sexual experience.

When you have a finite amount of resources and they're all privately owned, the wealthy begin to incur natural advantages (at its most basic; "economies of scale"). Those with money have much more freedom than those without; that includes freedom to make money. If there are one hundred people under capitalism, the one with the most amount of money is going to come out on top so long as he doesn't do anything stupid. When everything has a dollar value, those with more dollars are able to take more opportunities for themselves than those with no dollars. Because this includes opportunities to make more dollars, the process is a type of positive feedback loop. Wealth continues to concentrate into fewer and fewer hands and inequality gets worse. This, too, is a positive feedback loop. As inequality worsens, the laboring class becomes more and more desperate and are more and more at the mercy of the capitalist class just to find a way to procure bread and a shirt and a roof.

It's like picturing economies of scale for a business... except for an individual person. Oh... you have enough money to make a downpayment on a house? Now your monthly expenses are cheaper and you get to save some of your house payment as equity in your home. Don't have money? Pay out the ass to a landlord and accept that in this economy, you'll probably never be capable of saving up enough for a downpayment.

Have money? Go see the doctor when your insides are hurting you and straighten everything out right away.

Don't have money? Hope it goes away, and if it sticks around for several months, maybe try and pinch on the groceries for a month to save up enough to ask a doctor a few questions and then get a bill for an unknown amount sent to you in the mail at an unknown point in the future when you hope no other emergencies have arisen to clear the little bit of a rainy day fund you have.

Have money? Pay for your child's education so they can focus on their studies completely, perform well in school, and land one of the few good jobs.

Don't have money? Tell your kid to go terribly into debt and to work his ass off while also trying to do his best to attend to his studies. Tell your kid it's okay and that he tried his hardest when one of the privileged children who never had to work a day in their lives graduates with honors and gets that cushy job and your kid graduates with an acceptable GPA, thousands of hours flushed down some shitty wage job, and an assload of debt left on top of him, which severely limits his options for the future and leads him in his desperation to start serving tables at a restaurant because there is nothing more productive for society that he could be doing, since the ONLY way anything gets done under capitalism is if a wealthy person stands to make a good amount of money off of others by doing it.

The women that manufactured the clothes you're probably wearing right now live like slaves. Cramming into garment factories for long days and grueling hours, and in many places for less than $100/month. That isn't freedom. That isn't anything but exploitation rooted in prior exploitation. That is what the natural coercion of market forces has done to her.

Being forced to sell your time, energies, and (in a service job) yourself for barely enough to scrape by while the man who owns your time, energies, and yourself makes much more off of you than what he pays you isn't like a consensual sexual relationship between equal partners. If you want to use a parallel, it's like being forced into prostitution.

A further note on the positive feedback loop nature of capitalism: How is it possible for a human being born into this society to make money to try and escape that trap?

A] Work for wages -- which means do labor that has some level of value, and then have your boss take as much of that value for himself as he can get away with based on how desperate the other possible laborers in the economy are at present. It is fundamentally impossible for one laborer to move up in the economic food chain without further enriching a very wealthy individual already ahead of him.

B] Have a great idea and want to start your own company? Great! Go take out a massive loan from a bank and whether you succeed or fail, pay the bank more money than they gave you. You cannot create wealth for yourself without necessarily paying a portion of it up the ladder. Thus, social mobility for a few of the many poor entails further enrichment of the few wealthy, which means a smaller proportion remaining for the rest of the impoverished. The growth of inequality is absolutely inevitable (when it gets so bad we're forced to either intervene or simply let the wealthy come in like vultures and pick everything off the desperate workers at discounted prices during the recession).

What happens when you mix the necessity of property ownership in? What does a man do who is born into this society? He needs access to land in order to provide for himself -- either by growing food, building a shelter, or having a space to perform some skill/trade/craft. What happens when all of that land has already been stolen from those who originally used it and dwelt upon it and scooped up by the Boomers and those who came before them?

The poor in this country are fucked. The young in this country are poor. The assets of this country are firmly in the hands of the older and wealthier generations who got theirs when America had access to half the world's resources and then kicked out the ladder from beneath them, began privatizing everything, and began pumping out all of this neo-liberalism horseshit about "free markets."

Pro-tip: America likes free markets because America has the most money and influence, which means in any "free" trade, America is going to come out on top. That's how the coercive power of money works. If you have a lot and other people don't, but they desperately need it to survive, grow, and thrive, then they are going to be in a position where they are willing to work for much less or pay much higher prices, simply because they are desperate.

Adam Smith outlined this clearly; while two nations can each trade in their comparative advantage to their mutual benefit (i.e. one is better at making textiles, one is better at making wine), if one nation is better at making both textiles and wine, then the other nation can do nothing to compete. The only thing it can do is be exploited. Especially if we can cheaply pay to transport goods across the world so that we can abuse perpetually existing desperate pockets of the globe by forcing them to "compete" the only way they can: BY BEING WILLING TO WORK FOR SLAVE WAGES. This willingness then deflates the cost of their labor, even though the value of the labor is identical to what it would have been if the factories were located somewhere where the human beings doing the labor were required to be paid human living wages rather than treated like animals in cages.

From this place of exploitation, the nations become trapped. Workers in places like Cambodia can protest their >$100/month pay [EDIT: LESS THAN $100 PAY] and ask for an extra $14 and then be harassed by the state for going on strike and have a company like Nike (which profits immensely off the exploitation of these women) simply wash their hands of the blood and say, "Sorry; we don't set the prices, that's the job of the factory owner." As though the supply chain isn't one, continuous process that Nike is actively benefiting from. The factory owner is caught in the middle. The major corporations and banks, posting massive profits, are the ones who ultimately have all of the "slack" in the system. That's the only node in the chain where anybody has true "freedom" to do as they choose, and they wash their hands, go on luxury vacations, live sinfully wealthy lives, and stomp their boots in the faces of the slaves that made them, all while boldly declaring that they are improving the quality of those slave's lives, because the slaves "voluntarily" chose to enter the garment factory and work for whatever impossibly small rate "market forces" have decided the factory owner is required to let her keep.

source

Monday, June 24, 2013

Thoughts create emotions (and emotions create thoughts). I have benefited alot of a technique I learened from a book called 'Feeling Good' by David Burns. It's a book that uses cognitive behavioural therapy to challenge irrational thoughts.

1 - You write down your (negative) thoughts about the situation/yourself/whatever it is that you think

2 - You try to recognize any of the cognitive distortions which makes your though irrational http://www.nancycarterlcsw.com/sitebuilder/images/Cognitive_Distortions-650x910.jpg

3 - Once you found out which type of thinking errors are at the base of your thoughts, you can challenge it.
Example:

Thought: I'm a big loser, I failed the test like I do always, I will end up homeless.

Thinking errors: Labeling (loser), generalization (like i always do), jumping to conclusions, all or nothing thinking.

Rational response: I sometimes mess up, but that doesn't make me a big loser. I also have a couple of really good grades and it looks like I'm going to pass this class easily. If I don't pass it I won't end up under a bridge, I will just try again and I will most likely pass the test then.

It's a simple example, but maybe you can work with it. if you want to know more, download the book 'Feeling Good' by david burns. It's easy to download. Of course you can combine this technique with a meditation. You closely monitor your thoughts during meditation without interfering. just observe the negativity/irrationality of your thoughts.

Wednesday, June 12, 2013

Bitcoin Guide

Buying bitcoin
  • Bitinstant - https://bitinstant.com/ - Deposit USD Cash at locations like Walmart, CVS, and others. Deposit slip for Moneygram requires name, address and usually isn't checked. CVS may require ID, depending on regional policy and clerk's mood. Rate is guaranteed at time of deposit. Combined deposit fee of variable 3.99% (Bitinstant fee) + flat $3.95 (Zipzap fee). No signup required. DELAYS BEING REPORTED upto weeks in time due to high volume of transactions. BEWARE. (April 24, 2013)
  • Localbitcoins - https://localbitcoins.com/ - Buy & sell with cash in person. Signup required to contact buyers/sellers. Status varies with individual buyer/seller. Take appropriate safety measure when meeting someone in person. (April 24, 2013) Use a guide: http://dkn255hz262ypmii.onion/index.php?topic=155689
  • Blue Sky Traders - http://ok2yri46aaptiu2d.onion/index.htm - Deposit USD Cash at any Bank of America location, no ID or bank account required. (April 24, 2013)
  • Sugarmama on Silk Road - http://silkroadvb5piz3r.onion/silkroad/user/aace915f06 - Buy moneypaks/reloadit cards from various stores (moneypak cards cost $4.95, reloadit cards cost $3.95), No ID required. Sell the cards to Sugar Mama for bitcoins. Fee % decreases with larger moneypak/reloadit cards: 12-20% for moneypak, 10% for reloadit. Check her listings for availability (April 24, 2013)
  • bitcoin-otc on freenode - irc://irc.freenode.net/bitcoin-otc - http://bitcoin-otc.com - Buy/sell bitcoins from individuals in exchange for various options depending on ads. Accessing freenode IRC over tor requires a registered nickname, and SASL setup. Fees depend on individual ads. Tor friendly. (April 24, 2013) Use a guide: http://dkn255hz262ypmii.onion/index.php?topic=155689
  • Canadian Bitcoins - https://www.canadianbitcoins.com/ - Send CAD Cash by mail or in person ?
  • Coinbase - https://coinbase.com/ - ?
  • Cryptocurrent - https://cryptocurrent.com/ - Website says they are registering with US FinCEN to comply with anti money laundering laws. They are accepting orders for pre-existing clients (May 10, 2013)
  • Bitfloor - https://bitfloor.com/ - Deposit USD Cash at any Bank of America location using out of state deposit slip (New York), no ID or bank account required. Deposit fees % decrease with larger deposits. Buy/Sell USD for BTC at the exchange as needed. Sign up required. Tor friendly. Bitfloor has stopped trading indefinitely (April 17, 2013)
  • Bitcopia - http://bitcopia.com/ - Deposit USD Cash by mail at the moment for his regular clients (Wells Fargo account closed, Bank of America funds locked for 10 days since April 24, 2013), no ID or bank account required. Bitcopia's bank accounts are closed and no longer operational (May 1, 2013)
Moving bitcoin around

Please be careful with these. Read up on reviews before you trust your money to strangers, making sure you don't get your own coins back and that the operator is trustable or not.
The exchanges
Selling bitcoin
  • Localbitcoins - https://localbitcoins.com/ - Buy & sell with cash in person. Signup required to contact buyers/sellers. Status varies with individual buyer/seller. Take appropriate safety measure when meeting someone in person. (April 24, 2013)
  • Sugarmama on Silk Road - http://silkroadvb5piz3r.onion/silkroad/user/aace915f06 - Sell bitcoins for moneypaks/reloadit cards. Apply moneypak/reloadit cards to prepaid debit cards and spend like a credit card/paypal or withdraw cash from ATM. No fees to sell bitcoins. Check her listings for availability (April 24, 2013)
  • Canadian Bitcoins - https://www.canadianbitcoins.com/ - Sell bitcoins and get CAD cheque by mail or CAD Cash by mail or in person - ?
  • bitcoin-otc on freenode - irc://irc.freenode.net/bitcoin-otc - http://bitcoin-otc.com - Buy/sell bitcoins from individuals in exchange for various options depending on ads. Accessing freenode IRC over tor requires a registered nickname, and SASL setup. Fees depend on individual ads. Tor friendly. (April 24, 2013)
  • FastCash4Bitcoins - https://fastcash4bitcoins.com - Sell bitcoins and get USD via ACH (Direct Deposit), Bank Wires, Paypal, Dwolla, or check in mail. Not sure about ID requirements. 1% fee for Paypal, and anywhere from $1-$21 depending on other methods of sale. Tor friendly or not? (April 24, 2013)
source

Monday, June 10, 2013

Online Privacy Tools: Take Your Privacy Back

Don't ask your government for your Privacy, take it back:
If you have any problems installing or using the above software, please contact the projects. They would love to get feedback and help you use their software.

Have no clue what Cryptography is or why you should care? Checkout the Crypto Party Handbook or the EFF's Surveillance Self-Defense Project.

Just want some simple tips? Checkout EFF's Top 12 Ways to Protect Your Online Privacy.

Some have suggested I should also include: Cryptocat, Startpage, DNSCrypt, and I think Bitmessage is currently being developed.

Here is a good list of VPN providers that take anonymity seriously. Also, if you don't want your data stored in the cloud anymore, check out BitTorrent Sync.

Wednesday, June 5, 2013

Data Visualization


Theory

Although you could just wing it, knowing some of the why's and why not's of data visualization will help put your creations an inch or two above the rest.

I highly highly recommend picking up Edward Tufte's The Visual Display of Quantitative Information. After you read it you'll be able to make jokes about inside jokes about pie charts and be everyone's best friend. On a first read-through it might not make too much sense, but once you start working on projects light bulbs will start going off.

Practice

These days the major thing to learn in the world of data visualization is D3. It's a big hunk of JavaScript code that can help with everything from drawing maps to making graphs.

If you want to learn D3 (which you now should), the best place to start is Mike Bostock's Let's Make A Map. The end result is a pretty boring map of the UK, but it steps you through the hows and the whys of every single piece of code. When I first started with D3 I could have saved myself a lot of headaches by reading it closely.

Once you get your feet wet, [http://bost.ocks.org/mike/selection/](How Selections Work) is great for
clarifying some of the concepts behind how D3 deals with data display.
There's also a tutorials page on github, but the shortest and most efficient path to making cool visualizations is just plain copying. How to make great visualizations, in 3 steps:

1) Visit http://bl.ocks.org/mbostock 2) Scroll around until you find a couple examples of the kind of visualization you want to make 3) Copy the code, then hack away at it until it does want you want
Since you've already got some coding background you might be all set. JavaScript can be an insane beast at times, but if you start simple and from existing code you should get the hang of it without too much work.

A Brief Introduction To Coding For The Web

OK, so maybe you do need to learn a little HTML/CSS/JavaScript first. But let me stress the little - it's easy to get bogged down in the details, and the skills you need to edit a visualization to do what you want aren't exactly the same as when learning JS from scratch.

Fundamentals: HTML, CSS and Javascript. HTML is the information on a page, CSS is what makes it look nice. JavaScript it what makes it move around or be interactive. JS is the toughest, while HTML and CSS are easy (the basics, at least).

Go ahead and learn HTML and CSS from Codacademy first. I disagree with the way that every single place on the Internet teaches this stuff, but so it goes.

Check out these recommendations or these recommendations for JavaScript. If you don't feel like reading through them I'll just blindly point you toward Codecademy - JavaScript track, jQuery track.
Sidenote: jQuery is a big hunk of JavaScript that makes common web programming tasks easier.

But really, honestly, truly, you should read the links that aren't Codacademy.

What do I make visualizations about?

Any time you hear something interesting or read an interesting article or just think, "could I make a visualization out of this?"

Other resources

Pretend you're a developer for a news organization. Read up on Source, Data for Radicals, and a million other things I'm neglecting. If you want to get real crazy subscribe to the NICAR email list to see how people who do "computer-assisted reporting" think.

But honestly, just do it! That singles map was the very very first visualization I ever made, and 5 years later it's still getting plenty of traffic. Throw a bunch of nonsense up on a site, submit it to reddit, and eventually you're bound to have something work out.

Thursday, May 30, 2013

Getting Started with Star Trek

You can easily watch any of the shows in any order, although there are quite a few callbacks that might miss. It's generally accepted that the first two seasons of every series (except TOS) are terrible, so it's worth keeping that in mind. If you haven't seen the JJ Abrams films, they're probably a good place to start. There may be some small references you might miss, but I personally think they're more enjoyable if you don't have any knowledge of the Trek universe. Otherwise, I'd recommend starting off with either TOS, the second film, or TNG. DS9, VOY and ENT are all heavily reliant on refences to previous series and films, but these are mostly minor bits of fanservice which aren't usually required to understand the plot.

I've written some stuff about each series here. If this all seems overwhelming, then I'd say just start with TOS and work your way through each series/film from there.

The Original Series

This is a good place to start if you don't mind the poor production values and campyness. There are quite a few bad episodes, particularly in the third season, but the first and second are generally entertaining.
Some highlights:
  • "Space Seed" - Provides the backstory to Wrath of Khan.
  • "Balance of Terror" - First appearance of the Romulans.
  • "Errand of Mercy" - First appearance of the Klingons.
  • "City on the Edge of Forever" - Isn't really referenced in future episodes or series, but it's still a very good time-travel story.
  • "Amok Time" and "Jouney to Babel" - Both episodes provide some good backstory for Vulcans and Spock.
  • "Mirror, Mirror" - First appearance of the Mirror Universe.
  • "The Trouble with Tribbles" - A great episode which is revisited brilliantly by DS9.
For the TOS movies, I'd say skip the first and fifth. Two, three and four form a nice trilogy, and six is a great sendoff which leads nicely into TNG. The first film is very, very, very slow, although I personally enjoyed it. The fifth is...well...probably best skipped unless you feel like MSTing with some friends.

The Next Generation

TNG is a good place to start if you don't want to watch TOS. Although the series has a few multi-episode plotlines, you can pick almost any episode at random and watch it without knowing any of the backstory. Seasons one and two are pretty bad compared to the rest, so I'd recommend watching one or two later episodes first (Darmok or The Inner Light are good choices) just so you can get a good idea of what the show is like at its best.

For season one, I would advise that you only watch three episodes: Encounter at Farpoint, Datalore and Skin of Evil. They have the same level of quality as the rest of season one, but they're important for continuity reasons. If you decide to watch the rest of the season, just remember that it gets much, MUCH better later on.

With season two, avoid Shades of Grey. Otherwise this season is mostly okay. Some important episodes for future storylines include: Q Who, A Matter of Honor and The Emissary

From season three onwards the show becomes much, much better. There are quite a few divided opinions on some episodes, but generally it's agreed that 3-6 have the best episodes. Season seven was weaker, but is still of higher quality than season one.

The films all take place after the series is finished. Generations has some very noticables flaws, but has a major event which affects the later films. If you decide to watch DS9, I recommend seeing this film before you reach Season 4. The rest of the films can easily be watched at any time afterwards, although there are some minor references to DS9 and VOY. If you feel like doing things chronologically, watch First Contact during DS9 season five, Insurrection after finishing DS9 and Nemesis after finishing Voyager. Just be aware that Insurrection and Nemesis aren't as well regarded as most of the other films.

Deep Space Nine

DS9 is less popular than TNG and TOS, but there are quite a few people who prefer it. If you like shows with a multi-episode plotlines and a greater sense of continuity (like Babylon 5 or Battlestar Galactica) then you'll probably enjoy DS9. Like TNG it has a slow start, but unfortunately there are quite a few earlier episodes which are refenced later on. At the very least you can probably skip Q-Less and Move Along Home.

As DS9 first aired alongside TNG seasons 6-7, there are few minor plotlines which are refenced in both shows. You can easily watch DS9 after finishing TNG, but you may want to consider using this guide to watch them in order. It's not essential, but it can be entertaining.

Voyager

VOY is much less well-regarded than the previous two seasons. There are quite a few decent episodes, but the overall quality is lacking when compared to the other series. It does have its fans though, so try it out. Just be aware that, like DS9 and TNG, the first two seasons are not as good as the rest of the show. In particular avoid Threshold, an episode hated even by the guy who wrote it. If you do decide to watch it, I'd say save it for after DS9. It started airing during DS9's third season, but there aren't really any shared plotlines, aside from a brief cameo from Quark in the first episode.

Enterprise

ENT is just as polarizing as VOY, but I personally have a soft spot for it. Again, the first two seasons are full of bad episodes, but seasons three and four were showing a lot of improvement. Like VOY, I'd recommend you keep an open mind and watch it anyway.

Wednesday, May 1, 2013

Marriage

There's a tremendous responsibility in joining yourself to someone in marriage. You inherit their debts, their neuroses, their family, their love, their pain, their joy...their entire personhood becomes entwined into yours. You each give up a bit of your own identity, so that the two of you can craft a new one.

The first year is trying for most newlyweds. Personal space is a thing of the past. Hobbies that you could spend hours and dollars on are superseded by the need to furnish a life together. You can't check out emotionally. You have to actually talk about things. You have to consider your spouse's side. You have to be an adult.

But...there's an incomparable joy in losing yourself in love. You have a purpose beyond self-satisfaction. You might have children together, greatly diminishing yourself in one way, but adding to yourself in many others. Life is more vibrant, more chaotic, more tiresome, and more rewarding.

It's not for everyone. It's risky, giving a piece of your heart away. But if you choose your lover and best friend wisely, and commit to it with all your heart, it is the greatest adventure you'll ever take.

Failure and Success:a Primer

The terms failure and success are extremely binary and give the world a black and white perspective. There's only success, or its opposite - failure, right? Maybe, but maybe not.
Think about taking an exam. Come test day you're excited because you studied hard and you're ready to try your hardest to get that A you've been dreaming of. Let's explore the idea of you failing. Should you be upset that you failed? Maybe, but you gave it your all. You failed in arguably the best way possible.

Let's take the example of you failing, again. This time you didn't study, and you did even worse than in the case above. You're going to be upset that you failed, but let's be honest, we both know that you were unprepared. You didn't challenge yourself and you didn't aim to be your best. Even if you had passed the exam, you still failed yourself.

Let's look at that example now; you passed, but you got lucky and didn't study. Sure you can give yourself an imaginary pat on the back or brag to your friends, "I got an A and I didn't even open the book!" but when it comes time to apply that knowledge, you'll be sorry that you didn't study. If there's a cumulative final, then you're going to have to spend extra nights completely relearning that material because you might not be so lucky next time.

This last example is obviously the favorite. You passed and you worked damn hard to do it. You're proud, you're happy, you did it! All of those hours cramming made it so worthwhile and now you've got this rockin' GPA along with the material (somewhat) fresh in your memory. Come finals time you'll be able to knock it out of the park.

Now, in these examples, this is the most common ranking list:
  1. Tried your hardest, passed.
  2. Didn't try, passed.
  3. Tried your hardest, failed.
  4. Didn't try, failed.
But that's because the "didn't try" option can still theoretically yield passing results in that example. Let's take another example, asking somone out. The listing changes to:
  1. Asked him/her out (tried), got number
  2. Asked him/her out (tried), got rejected
  3. Didn't ask him/her out (didn't try), live with regret
In the test example, trying leaves you with either with the best outcome, or the 3rd best.

In the asking out example, trying leaves you with either the best or 2nd best outcome.

In almost any example, not trying is going to leave you with possibly the worst outcome.

Therefore you shouldn't focus on succeeding or failing, but trying. You should always aim to do your best possible and outdo your former self. If you're constantly outdoing yourself then eventually you won't even have to worry about failing, you'll only have to worry about not being better than who you once were.

Tuesday, April 30, 2013

Quick Guide to African Countries

Nigeria (English Speaking) - The most populated African country at 160+ million. The country has an extraordinary amount of oil wealth, but it is also one of the most corrupt countries on earth so most of it has been squandered. It is a giant on the continent. Nigerians are found in large numbers throughout the continent, and are sometimes seen as a bit of a menace/drain in the countries they inhabit.

South Africa (English Speaking) - The economic giant of the continent, it has a much higher standard of living than most of the rest of the continent, however there are still huge swathes of population living in abject poverty. Johannesburg alone accounts for 10% of the entire economy of the entire continent. Gold and mineral wealth abounds, diamonds and a healthy manufacturing sector contribute to it's wealth. It is also notable for the fairly large (~12%) white population. Unfortunately it is run by a horribly inept and entrenched government, also corrupt.

Ethiopia (Amharic Speaking)- Is another giant in terms of population, but is incredibly poor, with a very undeveloped agricultural economy. However, it seems to exert a lot of influence across the continent, (heading up the African Union for example). Ethiopia has one of the most distinct cultures on the continent, with the only written dialect originating on the African continent. It was also the only Sub-Saharan African country to not be fully colonized by a European power.

Democratic Republic of Congo (French Speaking) -This is hardly a functioning state, but should be noted for it's sheer size and potentially massive wealth of resources. The country is huge and virtually ungovernable, but even though it has huge areas of untouched natural areas it also has a sizable population. It is one of the last "Wild West's" in the world.

Egypt (Arabic Speaking) - A massive population and definitely an African power, but their face is firmly pointed towards the Middle-East. The country does have alot of influence and power, but it does not concern itself in African affairs as much as it does towards the ME. It does have some money, but huge portions of the population are very poor.

Ghana (English Speaking) - Not the most populated or richest, but probably the most successful country in terms of fostering a healthy, stable democracy, good governance, and an extremely fast growing economy. It has alot of potential and has been very well managed. It has the corruption associated with any under-developed country, but it has a well educated middle class growing healthily.
I could go on, but those are some of the most essential countries on the continent.

Uganda / Tanzania / Kenya- These three countries could all be grouped together as East Africa. They are all three very interconnected economically and are all generally peaceful and partially developing in key areas of economic activity. All were British colonies, they share Swahili culture for the most part and they are visited by alot more tourists than most other parts of Sub-Saharan Africa.

Kenya (English Speaking) - Kenya is the typical safari tourist destination that is often seen on nature shows. Nomadic tribes and hordes of animals dot the landscape. Culturally it is typically Africa, this is where they speak Swahili "hakuna matata" and all that, Tanzania also speaks Swahili. It is very diverse with desolate lawlessness outbacks towards the Ethiopian and Somali borders, but it also has a very sophisticated and cosmopolitan urban life in Nairobi, with a decent population of Indian descendants of labourers brought by the British. More often than not these Indians are very wealthy indeed. Kenya has always been relatively stable and semi-prosperous (relatively), but it's no stranger to spats of violence.

Tanzania (English Speaking) - A huge country that is home to widely spread-out towns and agricultural communties. Some of these outposts can be pretty isolated and poor, but like Kenya, the primary city Dar Es Salaam is pretty happening and is home to all kinds of wealthy people, as well as slums like Nairobi. Off the coast of Tanzania is the tourist destination of Zanzibar, an idyllic and beautiful place, formerly the seat of the Sultan of Oman. For this reason this island and the coasts of Tanzania and Kenya are much more Islamic than the interior.

Uganda (English Speaking) - Uganda is a beautiful little gem of a country, very densely populated in the lush green hills dotted by lakes, rivers and waterfalls. Like Tanzania and Kenya it is encircling part of the massive Lake Victoria. The country is known for having problems in the past with Idi Amin (Last King of Scotland) and some unrest in the north. But it has the unenviable position of bordering on some of the most unstable regions on earth; the Eastern DRC and Southern Sudan. Other than that, the country itself is now doing better and prospering along under a benevolent dictator. However, they just discovered oil under one of the lakes.

Angola (Speaks Portuguese) - Angola was a very war-torn nation, many Cold War proxy conflicts took place here amongst South African soldiers, Soviet backed movements as well as Cuban guerrilla's sent by Castro. It is now a very fast up and coming country, it has offshore oil, and alot of money is being pumped into the country by Brazil and particularly China. However, the economic elite is very small, very rich and very isolated. Much of the country is still completely undeveloped and dangerous, dotted with land-mines etc; but it is changing very fast and is one to watch.

Namibia/Botswana (English Speaking) - These two countries are very exceptional for a variety of reasons. They are firmly under the influence of South Africa, and are in a similar level of prosperity. Namibia and Botswana are two of the lest densely populated countries on earth, being mostly (very beautiful) desert. Botswana and Namibia have very healthy middle classes and consumer economies in their cities. Namibia also has a large white population like South Africa. They both have a very regulated and very lucrative diamond industry that has worked to benefit most of their tiny populations. For example, Botswana has less than 2 million people in an area the size of Texas or France. Namibia is similarly sparse. Well managed countries with relatively low levels of corruption. They do however, have some of the highest HIV infection rates on earth.

Mali (*French Officially) - Mali is a country smack dab in the heart of the Sahara desert where all population centres are formed along rivers and trade routes. It is a vast country of considerable wealth in the form of gold and minerals. Before Columbus sailed the ocean blue, it used to provide most of Europe and the Middle-East with gold for trade, during this time it had a large population of some of the worlds leading scholars and intellectuals (Timbuktu). However with the influx of New World gold the Malian Empire collapsed. These days it is a cultural tour de force, with a healthy music scene and unique culture. Unfortunately, nomadic tribesmen from the north have gotten hold of Libyan arms that have been circulating since the fall of Gaddafi, and they are causing trouble in the northern half of the country.

Libya (Arabic) - Libya has a very small population of ~6 or 7 million (compared to Egypt with 90 million+), and it has an extraordinary amount of oil wealth. Under Gaddafi people actually lived pretty well, with a government social structure that provided education and healthcare as well as other benefits. However, much of Libya's story is the story of Moamar Gaddafi, during his rule from 1969-2011 he ammassed a huge military stock-pile and was constantly meddling in the affairs of other countries. He used to fund insurgencies in the Philippines, Thailand and even gave support to the Irish Republican Army (terrorists), just to destabilize his enemies and possibly gain favour with some new regime. He saw himself as the Godfather of Africa. Bequeathing much wealth on his Sub-Saharan African allies. Throughout Africa there are clinics and schools and other facilities personally opened and inaugurated by Gaddafi using his (Libyan) funds. He wanted to start a Pan-African currency based on gold that would allow Africa to work together as a trading bloc (i.e. the EU or the US) and shelter all of those small African economies from the perpetual inflation that their currencies are subject to. This would allow prices for their goods to stabilize and allow them to import industrial goods at non-inflated prices and would help the Africans greatly, but Western countries would have to pay much much more for goods if they had to trade actual gold with Africans. It's an interesting notion and maybe someone else can offer more insight than I can in this (supposed to be!) brief summary.

Sudan/South Sudan - Before the creation of South Sudan, Sudan itself was the largest country in Africa and it can be summed up mainly by understanding the way it split. The northern half (what is now called Sudan) is mainly ethnic Arabic/North African as opposed to Black African. This Islamic North has ruled the country and done their best to subdue and dominate the southern black Africans who are of a totally different culture etc. The north and Khartoum are actually pretty civilized along the lines of say Egypt, it is also very peaceful and quiet up there. Almost all oil wealth was concentrated in the North so it is not poor by any means.

However the South physically had/has the oil so therein lies the conflicts.

Now that they have split the South still has to pipe it's oil (and some wealth) through the north, but in the meantime, South Sudan remains a desolate, chaotic region of earth that can hardly be called a country. There is not a paved road leading to any of it's borders.In fact there is only about two miles of pavement in it's capital Juba. 1 in 6 women who become pregnant will die. 1.9% of children complete primary school. 80% of the population does not have access to any kind of toilet facility. The average household is one hour from a water source. The stats are depressing. It is truly one of the least developed places on earth; in stark contrast to the north. Furthermore, South Sudan is still full of weapons and militia-men, the outlook is bleak.

from

Thursday, April 25, 2013

Making Changes

Two ways to go about becoming more confident in your ability to change you circumstances:

1) The quick "pill" method. It works, and you've heard it before: positive language. The words that you use when you talk to yourself, that internal dialogue that goes on inside your head, matters and it matters a great deal. Even if you believe one thing, it is possible to begin to believe the opposite simply by repeating phrases and using the right language. This works because your brain (and your body too, by the way) responds to the commands that you give it on a, I'll say but I'm not sure its the right word, cognitive basis. Repeat any thought or action enough and it will reprogram itself to fit the mold. It's the whole principle that underlies "practice makes perfect", and it works for thoughts as well as actions. In the same way you can pluck a few strings a hundred thousand times and learn to play the guitar, you can cut out the negative language and replace it with more assured messages that, over a long period of time, will become enshrined in your thought patterns and, ultimately, give you the "language" of confidence and a can-do attitude.

2) Now while the language is great, I have the opinion that it's not nearly enough on its own. What you need in addition is to build trust with yourself (remember, we're still trying to create faith in yourself here... this is all still about believing in your self i.e. confidence!). How do you build trust? It's simple: small, incremental steps. Start with ONE hobby. I recommend exercise as a first hobby (one because your health is the most important thing and two because it is an extremely effective starting point and helps facilitate the changes you are trying to induce). But you don't have to pick exercise... you can choose to learn a language, an instrument.. you can choose to travel or to cook or to kick some ass.. whatever you feel is closest to your heart. Start with that, and then add more hobbies and interests as you go along. Trust me, you could reddit and google all you want but nothing stimulates your intellect like actually going out and physically experiencing something first hand.

Now as you slowly begin to enrich your life, you will slowly begin to believe in yourself more. Please take real note of the word "slowly". The format options of reddit don't even come close for me emphasise it enough. You are making small, incremental steps. It is extremely important to be patient because real change does not and can not happen overnight. It takes an excruciating amount of time. We are trying to reverse bad habits and thought patterns that have been developing for years, and it will take years to reverse them and replace them with something better. The rate of change depends on your commitment but you need to have a really long-term perspective because change is slow. Trust me. But that isn't a bad thing at all.. success is success whether you look at it from a point A to a point B perspective or a point A to point C. It's just a temporal thing. The journey is what matters, really...

from

Friday, April 19, 2013

Take Your Privacy Back Online

Don't ask your government for your Privacy, take it back:
If you have any problems installing or using the above software, please contact the projects. They would love to get feedback and help you use their software.

Have no clue what Cryptography is or why you should care? Checkout the Crypto Party Handbook or the EFF's Surveillance Self-Defense Project.

Just want some simple tips? Checkout EFF's Top 12 Ways to Protect Your Online Privacy.

Monday, April 8, 2013

How to Make Delicious Ramen Noodles

Like all beautiful food, there are two barriers holding people back from making it. One is that they think it will take too long. If you're too busy or lazy to cut something with a knife, you don't deserve to eat beautiful meals. This takes thirty seconds anyway. The other is that they think it will cost too much. This too is a misconception. Everything here can be found a any supermarket.

Ingredients:
  1. Noodles
  2. Soup Base Packet
  3. Green Onion (one, washed and chopped)
  4. Cilantro (chopped, enough to halfway fill a shotglass)
  5. Carrots (cut into splinters, enough to fill a shotglass)
  6. Sweet Corn (frozen kernels, enough to fill a shotglass)
  7. Lime Juice (preferably from a slice)
  8. Garlic (minced)
  9. Chicken (one frozen tenderloin)
  10. Sriracha OR red pepper flakes OR fresh sliced peppers OR all three
  11. black pepper
Begin as though you were making normal, loser ramen. Boil water and add the seasoning packet. Take your frozen chicken tenderloin and put it in the microwave for one minute at full power.

Meanwhile, start heating up some oil in a pan at medium-high. When the pan starts to smoke a bit, add the oil, the garlic, then the white parts of the green onion you sliced. The whole pan should be screaming mayhem. That's okay. Your chicken is defrosted enough. Put it in the pan. It will start to cook.

Put your carrot splinters in the boiling water. They take longer to cook.

Back to the chicken. Once it's not pink in the middle any more, You're going to pull it apart with two chopsticks. I know it's weird. Just do it. You'll get a handful of little strips. I like these more than cubes, and I don't need to dirty a cutting board, because it all happens in the pan. Keep stir frying the strips in the pan until they are crispy but not charred.

Then back to the pot. Add your noodles finally, along with the corn and whatever you use to make it spicy.

Put the chicken in the pot, and scrape in any garlic or green onion left in the pan. As soon as the noodles soften up, pour the contents of the pot into whatever you're eating ramen out of. Soggy ramen is gross.

Pepper loses its flavor if you cook it too long, so add it now. Sprinkle the green part of the green onions you chopped on top of everything, along with the cilantro. Drizzle with lime juice. Garnish with two stalks of cilantro if you are serving this to somebody.

Now eat your delicious ramen.